.png)
- October 2020 (1)
- September 2020 (1)
- June 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- September 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (3)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (1)
- October 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (1)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (9)
Earlier this year, BFMV decided to conduct a direct-to-physician call coverage survey for a number of reasons. Perhaps the primary reason was that we wanted to better understand the "burden" of off-site/unrestricted call coverage generally, and more specifically, how (and if) it impacts compensation. For this reason, we surveyed physicians directly rather than facilities, since physicians are the party with direct knowledge of a variety of burden-related factors (phone calls received, in-person activations, etc.) The following is a list of four insights from the survey: 1. The physicians most likely to receive a stipend for providing call coverage services are highly paid surgeons. This may
